Search

2022 Legislative Recap for Georgia Companion Animal Bills

Updated: Apr 20

The 2022 Georgia General Assembly concluded on April 4th with mixed results for companion animals and exposed the continuing obstacles that animal protection legislation faces in Georgia.

The GPC professional lobbyist was there at every step of the way during the legislative session to promote our priority bills and to ensure that the companion animal community spoke with a unified voice to lawmakers. Many thanks to our subject matter experts for their help with bill language and fact sheets, and to member organizations in the Georgia Alliance for Companion Animal Protection (GACAP) for their endorsements, support, and written testimonies. The GPC serves as the coordinator for GACAP.


This is an election year, so please take the time to ask incumbents and candidates where they stand on these issues. Your vote is the voice for companion animals.

SR 402: This resolution was ADOPTED by the Senate to acknowledge the importance of Spay/Neuter Awareness Month and World Spay Day (February 22). A resolution is often a statement of policy, belief, or appreciation; it usually does not enact a statute.


SB 515: This bill would authorize first responders to provide emergency treatment and ambulance transport of K-9 police dogs to vet clinics and provides immunity from civil liability for doing so in good faith. Police dogs risk their lives every day and deserve prompt medical attention when injured. SB 515 had 21 sponsors but did not receive a vote in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee.


HB 609: Spearheaded by the GPC, this bill would prohibit the sale of dogs, cats and domestic pet rabbits in poorly regulated outdoor locations such as parking lots and roadsides. Passage of the measure would be an important step towards limiting opportunities for illegal pet sales by Georgia’s many unlicensed and reckless backyard” breeders. The bill did not receive a hearing in the House Agriculture & Consumer Affairs Committee and therefore did not move forward. The Georgia Veterinary Medical Association endorsed HB 609.

HB 1450: Georgia Safe Outdoor Dog Act: This lifesaving bill would improve the minimum standards of care and safe restraint for dogs who live outdoors, thereby providing a safety net to help prevent irrevocable physical harm. HB 1450 had a groundswell of support from both advocates and lawmakers (15 cosponsors) but did not move forward because the House Agriculture & Consumer Affairs Committee declined to put it on their agenda for a vote.

Problematic Bills/Resolutions for Companion Animals That Did Not Pass


SR 135: This resolution required a two-thirds majority in both chambers to become a ballot measure in November to amend the state constitution to allow sports gambling. SR 135 was revised in late session to include parimutuel betting which would have brought horse racing to Georgia. Fortunately, the resolution as written did not receive a vote on the House floor. GPC continues to oppose any bill that would burden Georgia citizens with the expensive aftercare of retired Thoroughbreds.


SB 303: Originally intended to improve the living conditions of breeding dogs in puppy mills, this bill had problematic language that would have increased backyard breeding in Georgia. The bill’s sponsor ultimately gutted the bill and replaced it with bogus “puppy lemon law” language that would have weakened consumer protections when buying a sick puppy from a pet store and potentially served as a vehicle for preemption legislation (similar to retail pet sales HB 144 in 2017). The AKC lobbyist testified in favor of the new bill version. The Senate Agriculture & Consumer Affairs Committee declined to move the bill forward but assigned the topic to a study committee (see SR 803).


SR 803: This resolution was introduced very late in session for the purpose of creating a study committee on the “prevention of unhealthy puppies and protection ethical retail sales.” The title is hypocritical because puppies sold in pet stores are primarily sourced from puppy mills. Further, the breeder Code of Ethics for most national breed clubs forbids or discourages their members from selling litters to pet stores. The resolution appears to be another attempt by the pet store industry to pass a fake puppy lemon law that would weaken existing consumer protections. Fortunately, SR 803 did not pass out of committee.

13 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All